- The AI Stack for devs
- Posts
- Stop the spiral: Debugging Decay in AI coding tools
Stop the spiral: Debugging Decay in AI coding tools
Find out why “just one more try” might be sinking your productivity
Before you jump in, here’s something you’ll love.
I’ve put together a curated list of MCP servers and MCP registries to support your development workflows. When you subscribe to the newsletter, you’ll get instant access to this resource in your welcome email.
Bonus: I’m also working on a collection of free educational resources for building AI agents at every skill level. Coming soon for subscribers. Stay tuned!

This week, we’re diving into a phenomenon you’ve probably felt but maybe couldn’t name: why AI code assistants like GPT-4, Claude or Gemini start strong when debugging and then suddenly spiral into nonsense.
New research here quantifies what’s going wrong and which allows us to come up with a fix.
What’s Debugging Decay?
Debugging Decay Index (DDI) a framework to measure and predict when LLMs lose effectiveness in iterative bug fixing.
DDI gives us four actionable metrics:
Initial Effectiveness (E0): how strong the model is on its first attempt
Decay Rate (λ): how fast performance drops
Strategic Cutoff (t0): the best moment to reset context
Fit Quality (R2 ): how well decay matches observed behaviour

bug fix success rate from the report
LLMs lose 60–80% of their debugging ability within 2-3 attempts in the same thread. By attempt 4–5, debugging is often worse than random guessing.
Claude Sonnet was the only model that didn’ show any significant sign of degradation making it “The model“ for coding.
So why does it happen?
Context pollution: Each failed fix pollutes the session with false paths.
Tunnel vision: The model clings to early wrong assumptions and can’t reset
Token bloat: More isn’t better. Excess tokens = lower accuracy.
Surface level reasoning: LLMs pattern match, they don’t truly understand.
Malicious compliance: Some fixes just silence the error, not solve it.
If you’re not a subscriber, here’s what you missed this month
Subscribe to get access to such posts every week in your email.
How to beat this decay
1. Reset after 3 attempts:
- Start a new chat after 3 failed attempts. Fresh context = fresh thinking
2. Use strategic restarts: On reset, tell the model
- Who you are and what you’re building
- Purpose of the feature
- Current state and error trace
- Your debugging hypotheses
If you’re using Claude Code/Cursor leverage their instructions file.
3. Rotate models for second opinions
- Some models decay slower.
4. Rephrase for exploration:
- Don’t paste the same error again. Add hypotheses, contrasting examples or new test inputs to widen the model’s thinking.
5. Force hypotheses: Before asking for a fix, ask
- What are the top 5 likely causes?
- How would you test/falsify each one?
- Why might this fix fail?
6. Chunk it up
- Break the problem into atomic steps.
7. Track failed attempts:
- Prompt the model to keep a log:
8. Checkpoint your code
- Save working states regularly. Don’t rely on the model to remember what worked.

Want to get the most out of ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a superpower if you know how to use it correctly.
Discover how HubSpot's guide to AI can elevate both your productivity and creativity to get more things done.
Learn to automate tasks, enhance decision-making, and foster innovation with the power of AI.

👀 Whats shipping this week?
📖 Worth the scroll
Anthropic blocks OpenAI from using Claude after OpenAI staff allegedly used its coding tools for GPT-5 development, sparking fresh AI rivalry.
Anthropic’s interactive prompt engineering tutorial is a free chapter based course to help master prompt design for Claude models including best practices, troubleshooting and advanced techniques.

🤓 Case Studies
The 2025 Stack Overflow Developer Survey reveals 84% of developers now use AI tools, but trust is dropping, with only 33% believing AI answers are usually accurate. Security, price and better alternatives drive tech rejection. Claude Sonnet is the most admired LLM .
Stack Overflow AI survey
Most developers haven't adopted AI agents yet. That’s why you’re here, right? 😉 Stay tuned, experiment early and watch everyone else play catch-up!

📰 Recommended newsletters
Techpresso gives you a daily rundown of what's happening in tech and read by 300,000+ professionals.
The Deep View The go to daily newsletter for 250k+ founders and knowledge workers who want to stay up to date with artificial intelligence..

💬 Quick question: What's the most time consuming part of your development workflow? Reply and I’ll build a tutorial to automate it.
Thanks for reading
- Sanket